Thursday, May 03, 2007

EXACTLY WHAT I NEED

This morning’s workout called for 11 miles with 7 at 15k to half marathon pace. I was excited about the workout, yet kind of dreading it at the same time because I knew it would hurt. I did a similar workout a month ago, but was on the treadmill, which makes the pacing a lot easier. This morning’s run was through the rolling terrain of Hyland Park. I was on the bike path, so it wasn’t has hilly as Trail Mix, but still, it wasn’t flat.

I thought 6:20 pace would be a good goal, but also wanted to give myself a little buffer. So I decided to try and run between 6:20 and 6:30 pace. Rather than ease into the pace and make excuses later, I figured I’d better go out hard if I really wanted to hit the lower end of that range. I came through the first mile in 6:19 – perfect. I was a little discouraged to see 6:28 after mile two, however, with the rolling terrain, all miles are not created equal. A 6:10 third mile bolstered my spirits and put me back on-pace. The last half mile before turning around was uphill in 3:18, followed by a downhill 3:05 – good enough for a 6:23 fourth mile. What came down at 6:10 pace on the way out went back up at 6:37 pace. I figured that’d be the case, so mentally I was prepared for what I saw. The last two miles were 6:22 and 6:29, which means I ran 6:24 pace for the 7-mile stretch. Not bad.

I'm actually pretty sure I can run a half marathon faster than 6:24 pace, (I ran 6:25 pace in January) but I'll take it since race paces are always hard for me to hit in training. My new "rule" is that whatever distance I can run in a race, I can only run half that distance in training - at the same pace.

As usual, thoughts of my last race continue to linger. I’ve come to the conclusion that I’m more disappointed in my effort than in my time. I can’t remember how I came across this gal’s blog, but she raced a 10K over the weekend too and did an awesome job describing what was missing from my race;

Moments later just before the 6km marker, another set of steps came from behind and I could see in the shadow on the ground that this runner had two small pig-tails…crap! I thought, here we go. KR breezed by me quite easily and momentarily, I gave in and was about to shut down when I remembered what Fatty was drilling into my head all week 'if someone passes you, don't let them go. Focus on their back and think of nothing else, see nothing else and don’t let the gap get bigger no matter what'. So, I surged ahead and got right in behind her and did just that. Good gawd I wanted to stop about a dozen times. I think we both did! At the 8km the real fun began. KR and I played a stubborn game of cat and mouse, each taking turns leading, pushing each other, surging back and forth, hoping the other would crack. With about 800 meters to go, I made my move and opened up my stride, dug deeper still and managed to pull away. Today’s race wasn’t my best time-wise but mentally it was a great race experience. I learned that at the point (s) I feel like I have to stop that there is actually more in the tank to give.

That paragraph, along with today’s quote of the day, sums up exactly what I need to work on.

Quote of the day;

“...to be a winner, the athlete must accept pain – not only accept it, but look for it, live with it, learn not to fear it.” – Dr. George Sheehan

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

TABLES HAVE TURNED

One of my latest interviewees, Laurie, is the editor of this fine publication. Recently she turned the tables on me and asked if I’d be up for an interview to talk about my other blog. It was harder than I thought it'd be - but it was fun. As usual, I like to give my readers a chance to read this kind of stuff - Minnesota readers get a sneak peek, before the article is in print.

In his first six months blogging about the Twin Cities running scene, Minnesota runner Chad Austin interviewed over 25 local athletes about their passion for the sport. Those interviews are posted on Austin's blog, Running Minnesota, along with links to articles for additional reading on our favorite hometown athletes. In early May, his site had accumulated over 15,000 hits—advertised only by word of mouth. Here’s what Austin had to say about his site.

What is main goal of your blog? What do you cover?
The main goal is to get the best runners around to tell me their secrets. I’m interested in covering how they got involved with the sport, their achievements, setbacks, training, goals, philosophy and any other interesting nuggets that I can dig up.

When and why did you start it?
I actually started blogging 2 years ago in an effort to write about my training, as well as all the thoughts that flow through my head while running. One of the bloggers I was following started a website called eliterunning.com. She features links to nearly every running-related article that’s written and sprinkles in interviews with runners throughout the country. It’s a great site, but it’s also overwhelming. That led to the idea of creating a similar site that just focuses on the Minnesota running scene. However, since there aren't a lot of articles written on Minnesota running, I focus mainly on interviews.

How do you pick the people you interview?
I started out by just making a list of about 100 runners that I know, or at least know of, who I thought would be interesting to interview. To get the ball rolling, I started by interviewing a guy I train with and two of his friends. Then I moved on to a guy I went to college with. From there, those people, along with some of the readers started recommending other people to interview.

When I first started the site I really thought I’d be limited to just local age-group runners. However, after about six interviews, things just started to snowball. I started interviewing Olympic Trials qualifiers, a Team USA Minnesota runner, a running pioneer from the ‘70s, a couple of college All-Americans, the husband of an elite runner, and so on. I’ve been amazed by how receptive the interviewees have been. They seem more excited to be interviewed than I am to interview them.

The only real criteria when picking who I'm going to interview is “Do they have something interesting going on that I'm aware of?” It makes for better interview questions if I have some idea about their history, recent race results, goals, dreams, etc.

Who were the most interesting people to interview?
Not to sound politically correct, but they’ve all been great. Right now I’m looking at the list of people I’ve interviewed and I’m really flabbergasted. I’ve only been doing this for 6 or 7 months, but there are already over 25 incredible people that I’ve interviewed.

With that said, I’ll mention three interviews that come to mind; 1) Michael Reneau because he had just qualified for his first Olympic Trials Marathon (something his father did 40 years ago) and he also announced he was moving to Michigan to train with the Brooks-Hansons Distance Project, 2) Matt Gabrielson because he’s humble, knows he’s blessed to be able to run for a living and doesn’t take it for granted, and 3) Steve Hoag because I’m intrigued with the history of running in Minnesota and he was one of the pioneers.

What have you learned from interviewing so many local runners?
We're all different and there are many different approaches to training that lead to success, however, they all include hard work. But while that hard work is designed to lead to PRs and victories, that's not what running is all about. It's about competing against yourself, pushing your physical and mental limits, while developing incredible friendships along the way.

What is your history, present and future with running?
I followed my dad out the door when I was 10 years old and I’ve been at it (for the most part) for the last 27 years. After high school, I spent 4 years in the navy and didn’t do a lot of running. Being a non-traditional student, I decided to go out for the cross-country team at UW-Eau Claire, more as a way of meeting people, than anything else. That’s where I rediscovered my love of running.

Currently, I like to tease myself with the thought that I can still chase down my college PRs. More reasonably, finding new race distances is about the only way I’m going to set PRs. Right now I’m more intrigued by the marathon than anything else. In addition to running, I'm presently writing a variety of articles for the Minnesota Distance Runners Association's newsletter.

I'm not sure what the future holds, but I can all but guarantee that running will be a part of it. It's consumed nearly three quarters of my life and I don't see it going away anytime soon.

What is your favorite race?
My favorite local race is the Human Race 8K. After hibernating all winter, people come out of the woodwork for this race. It’s really the first time of the year when you get to see runners you haven’t seen since October or November. That alone creates a real buzz of excitement around this race. In addition, it's really the first race of the year that lets me see how my fitness has survived the winter.

I also enjoy the whole Grandma’s Marathon atmosphere. I grew up about an hour east of Duluth and my dad would run Grandma’s every year. Going there now and running the race myself brings back lots of fond childhood memories, like seeing Dick Beardsley's sub-2:10 and seeing my dad break 3-hours and qualify for the Boston Marathon.

What are your PRs?
During my college years, I ran 9:40 (3K), 16:50 (5K), 28:10 (8K), 34:57(10K) and 1:20:21 (half marathon). After college, running took a back seat to finding a job, starting a career, going to graduate school, etc. Running suffered and I got frustrated trying to compare all my races to what I ran in college. So when I turned 30-years old, I started a new list of post-30 PRs; 18:14 (5K), 29:05 (8K), 37:32 (10K), 1:17:57 (20K), 1:22:16 (half marathon), 2:58:10 (marathon), and 14:30 (Ironman).

What are your running goals for this year and long term?
This year I’d like to set all new post-30 PRs, but I’m mainly focused on the marathon. I think I've been in sub-2:55 shape in recent years, but I've never put it together on race day. I plan on changing that this year. In addition to time goals, I'd like to meet at least one new person at every race this year.

I don't know if it's realistic or not, but long term, I'd like to break 2:50 in the marathon someday. That was the open standard to qualify for Boston in the '80s and I'd like to think I can compare to that. More realistically, now that I'm getting older, I'm more concerned with running as a lifestyle, staying fit, and the camaraderie associated with the sport.

Do you have any future plans for the blog?
I’d like to add some advertising and start collecting subscription fees, so I can quit my day job. Seriously, I’m happy with what I’m doing and how the blog has been received within the running community. I’ve received a lot of positive feedback, which makes me want to keep the momentum going and continue to shed light on the people that help make the Twin Cities (and Minnesota) one of the best running communities in the country. While I'm happy with the number of people I've interviewed so far, it's not even a drop in the bucket when you consider all the talented runners in our great state.

Quote of the day;

“The perfect marathon is like the perfect wave, and every marathoner keeps looking for it.” – Dr. George Sheehan

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

AT SOME POINT

Ryan had a good comment/question yesterday asking if I settled in to 6:10s because I was fatigued or because it was more of a conscious choice. Looking back, I really think it was a conscious choice. I didn’t feel that fatigued, but I never really made an effort to push the pace either. I don’t know if it has to deal with not wanting to hurt, lack of motivation for shorter races or what. I think if I spent a year doing 5K – 10K races it’d either lead to my “retirement” or a breakthrough.

One thing I really need to figure out is if 6:00 pace is a physical or mental barrier. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t think there’s some type of wall surrounding that pace for me. I guess if it is a mental barrier, the good thing is that at some point, as I age, my mental barrier has to match my physical limits. If I’m still running 6:00 pace 20 years from now, I won’t be so upset.

Bill sent me an email outlining a bunch of runners that had slowed down significantly from last year. I’m glad to hear I’m not the only one that does this kind of stuff. I’d already compared a bunch of people’s pace as Human Race compared to Get in Gear. Of course, some were faster over 10K and some were slower, so it’s hard to get a real feel. I guess it’s safe to say that my 7-8 seconds per mile increase is “in the ballpark”.

Anyway, here’s a training update; Saturday's mileage gave me 57 miles for the week. I kept my string of taking Sundays off alive. Monday I doubled up with 6 in the morning and 5 in the evening. Those runs gave me 254 for the month on 24 days of running and 28 runs. That’s lower than where I had been because I dropped down to Pfitz’s 70 mpw plan. This morning I was up at 4:10 for a 15 miler. That’s a nice way to start off the month of May.

Quote of the day;

“I have been gearing all my training this year for the 10,000. I didn't have a very good 5000 meter race at Mt. SAC on April 13 to open my outdoor season but now I have the reassurance that I am doing the right stuff for what I am focusing on. It goes to show that when you have a bad race, you just need to stay confident in your training. I'm really excited about achieving my qualifying time because now I can start racing.”Katie McGregor, after obtaining the Olympic qualifying standard for the 10,000m.

Monday, April 30, 2007

GET IN GEAR RACE REPORT

30 seconds. 5 measly seconds per mile.

It’s the difference between being happy and being satisfied.

It’s the difference between a good race and re-thinking my entire training plan. The idea was to cut my mileage in order to make my hard days hard. You’d think if I could hold 5:57 pace for 8K 6 weeks ago, that I’d be able to hold 6:00 pace for 10K after cutting my mileage and adding in some harder workouts.

Even with the lower mileage, maybe fatigue played a part, given that I ran 22 on Saturday, ran a VO2 max workout on Tuesday and then ran 14 miles on Thursday. My legs felt okay, but they lacked that zip you hope for on race day.

I think I made 2 mistakes in this race. First, I didn’t take full advantage of the first 2 miles, which are mostly a gradual downhill. I wanted to save something for the hill that occurs just after the halfway point. That’s a sound strategy, however, once up the hill I never really engaged in the race and picked things up. That was mistake number two. Up till that point I hadn’t looked at my watch at all. When I passed mile 4 I heard 24:10 (6:02 pace). Instead of picking up the pace and going after 6:00 pace, I just sort of settled in and was content to run 6:10s and maintain my position.

Before the race I thought about trying a new tactic for goal setting. Instead of setting a specific time goal, like 37:17 or 6:00 pace, I’d pick a time I was pretty sure I could hit, like 38:00, and try to run as far under that as possible. My reasoning was that if I wasn’t on 6:00 pace during the race, I wouldn’t give up. I would continue to push to get as far below 38:00 as possible. The verdict is still out on this approach. It needs some reevaluation.

I ended up splitting 18:40/19:07 = 37:47 (6:05 pace), which put me 111th overall out of 4,025 runners and 13th in my age group. Here are the results.

This is one of those races where you’d like to hang out afterwards and talk with as many people as possible. Unfortunately, I had to leave right away in order to get to a dance recital. I was fortunate enough to meet Bill and Adam (I believe), both who’ve been following along with my blog. That’s always cool. Of course, unless they turn out to be psychotic.

Finally, how’s this for weird? At the Human Race 8K in March I was the 100th male. Saturday I was again the 100th male. If I do that at Grandma’s, based on the last 3 years, I’d finish between 2:53 and 2:58.

Quote of the day;

“Always be happy, but never satisfied.” – Lisa Stone, University of Wisconsin’s women’s basketball coach (when she was at UW-Eau Claire)

Thursday, April 26, 2007

MID-WEEK MEDIUM-LONG

About the time I figure I don’t have anything to write about, something comes along. A special thanks to Bill for forwarding me this link (scroll towards the bottom) to a couple of interviews of Ryan Hall after the London Marathon. Not only are they interesting to watch because of Ryan, but they're interesting (at least to me) because they’re conducted by my college coach. There’s something about his questions and his understanding of running that I always find, oh what’s the word; mesmerizing, fascinating, intriguing, etc. His writing (Track & Field News) is the same way.

I was up at 4:15 today for a mid-week, medium-long run. I managed to get in 14 miles over many of the same trails from last Saturday’s race. Last year at this time I was injured but didn’t want to admit it. I was in the process of taking a few days off/cross-training, then trying to run, then taking more time off, etc. This year I’m feeling really good and trying not to take it for granted.

After the run I was listening to the radio and they were pissing and moaning about how hard it is to exercise, eat right and stay fit. It made me think that I’m really lucky to have a hobby that helps me keep my weight down. I’m not sure what would happen if I actually had to “exercise” and watch what I eat. I don’t know about anyone else, but I never think of running as exercise. I know it is exercise, but I just don’t view it that way. And while I talk about eating better, I’m pretty sure I could eat as crappy as I wanted to and I’d still weigh less than 145 pounds. I guess running is a good habit in that sense.

Quote of the day;

“I learned that the extra work (diet, strength work, etc.) can make the difference between being average and being great”. - Ed Whetham

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

SHARING A "SECRET"

Here’s a photo of me from the 25K that Don found at skinnyski.com. I was going to wear a hat, but then it was too warm – that helps explain my “great” hairdo.

Two more things about Trail Mix and then I’ll “let it go”. First, I love triathletes as much as the next person, but I can’t help but give them a hard time. I saw a couple of triathletes (and I’m sure this wasn’t limited to triathletes) during this race that were loaded down with enough drinks and gels to feed a small family. Apparently the 6 aid stations over the course of 25K weren’t enough to meet their needs.

Second, I almost hate to share this “secret” because I think it saved me a lot of time during the race. But, as a public service, I will share it; run the tangents. This secret applies to all races, but I think it’s even more important for trail running. On the trails it’s easy to get lulled into running in the middle of the path, where the single-track is beaten down. However, if you run the tangents, back-and-forth across the trail, and cut close to the tree-line, you can shave off a lot of distance – especially when you consider that trail races usually have more turns than road races.

Nothing exciting to report with my training today, just an easy 6 mile recovery run this morning.

I’ll close by inviting people to read my latest interview.

Quote of the day;

“The thing I have taken away from the Human Race [8K] is a reassurance that I can run at a level that is higher than I have in the past.” - Ed Whetham

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

HEEDING MY OWN ADVICE

I’m still thinking about the 25K a little bit. Not exactly sure why, but it was a gumption builder – even though my overall time wasn’t great. Maybe it’s the rush of passing a bunch of people. Maybe it has to do with how good I felt, while still getting in a 22 mile long run.

Here’s an elevation (green line) map of Saturday's 25K that I stole from Brent.

I’m kind of kicking around the idea of running to 50K someday. Heck, I basically ran the equivalent of 3 laps, so I’d “only” have to run 1 more lap. I was thinking about running it next year, but if I go back to Boston, then there’d only be one week between races. That sounds crazy to me, but when I was talking with John a week ago, he said he set his marathon PR (2:28) the week (okay, it was 8 days) after running 2:33. And a couple of weeks later he ran a 50 miler.

Sunday I thought about trying to make up for missing Friday’s run. In the morning, I jogged a little with my dog and my legs were really tired. I decided to heed the advice I often give others; “Don’t try and make up missed training. It’s gone, just move on.” So I took the day off. Yesterday included two easy 5 mile runs.

This morning it was back to the prairie “track” for another round of 600m repeats. I’m not sure why Pfitz had me do 6 repeats the first time and only 5 this time, but I didn’t complain. I didn’t even bother to time them this time. I just ran “by feel” and thought about how I want to race this weekend’s 10K.

As I mentioned in a comment, trying to compare my two recent 25Ks is “fun”, however, since I didn’t race them all-out, it’s basically meaningless. Saturday’s 10K will be all-out and hopefully meaningful. My fastest post-college 10K is 37:32, which I set 2.5 years ago. Two years ago I ran 37:42 on this course. I’d like to break 6:00 pace, which is 37:18 and think sub-37 is even possible.

Quote of the day;

“I was drinking water a lot. [The weather] didn't feel too bad. Honestly, when you have a good day you don't really notice those things much.” – Ryan Hall, after his 2:08:24 debut marathon in London over the weekend.

Monday, April 23, 2007

WORST RACE REPORT EVER

A funny thing happened on my way to using the Trail Mix 25K as a long, hard run; I ended up running pretty well.

I drove to the park early on Saturday so I could get in a long (5 mile) warm-up. I wanted to run 20-22 miles for the day and I figured once the race was over I’d start visiting, so I’d better get in a long warm-up.

The race course is kind of like a “figure 8” with a north loop and a south loop. Each loop has a rather large hill (or two on it). To make matters worse, you have to run 2 laps. My objective was to run an easier first lap and then pick up the pace during the second lap. This type of race strategy definitely requires checking your ego at the door, especially when you’re standing at the starting line and you see a bunch of people you know – including triathletes that I trained with for the last two years.

I stuck with my strategy and was a little surprised by how many people were in front of me. By about a half mile I had worked up to some familiar faces; John (who’d go on to finish 76th), Terry (42nd) and Dylan (62nd). About 2.5-3 miles into the race is the first big hill. We run up the backside of a ski hill and then down the ski hill. At this point I came upon Matt (113th), Rob (46th) and Norm (63rd).

Nothing exciting happened until the big hill on the south loop, which is about 5 miles into the race. That’s when I saw Jim (55th). Once up this hill I began to roll pretty well. I was actually shocked when I came through the halfway point in 56:16 (7:15 pace). Two weeks ago I ran the Ron Daws 25K in 1:51:43 (7:12 pace). While that was a training run too, the effort felt a lot harder than what I was putting forth on the trails. A quick calculation and my goal for the day became to negative split by 2+ minutes and to break 1:50.

During the second loop I entertained myself by counting the number of runners that I passed. Given that there was a 50K race going on at the same time, it was a little difficult. I ended up counting 17 runners, but looking at the results, I think I may have missed a few. I know I passed about 6-7 guys before passing Kelly (37th).

I ended up running a 3-minute negative split; 53:15 (6:51 pace) and finished in 18th place (out of 450) with a 1:49:31 (7:04 pace). Of course, now that I’ve looked at the results, I’d have liked to have run a couple of minutes faster to catch a few more people that I know.

And looking at the results from both 25Ks, it looks like everyone that ran both races ran between 1 to 4 minutes slower on the trails, while I ran 2 minutes faster. Best of all, like I mentioned earlier, this race felt about 10 times easier.

Afterwards I even managed a 1.5 mile cool-down, which gave me 22 miles for the day and 55 miles for the week (I never got out for a run on Friday) on 5 runs.

Alright, that’s probably the worst written race report ever, so I’ll stop here.

Quote of the day;

“Chart your progress by your own standards, and don’t drive yourself too hard seeking to match somebody else’s.” – Alberto Salazar

Friday, April 20, 2007

I'VE GOT NOTHING

I wish I had something to post, but even after not posting yesterday, I’ve really got nothing to say.

Yesterday I ran an easy 8 mile recovery run. This morning I was supposed to run 11 miles, but Katie was scared last night and kept waking up. I couldn’t get back to sleep, so I turned off my alarm. Now I’ll have to run tonight, but doubt I’ll get in 11, mainly because I’m planning on 20-22 tomorrow morning. Running 31-33 miles in the span of 12 hours might not be the wisest thing to do. Tomorrow’s long run will include this race, which I plan on running about as hard as the 25K from two weeks ago. It’s part of the MDRA Grand Prix, so just by running it I’ll earn some points.

This morning I was lucky enough to post another interview, which was conducted by a ”celebrity contributor”.

Quote of the day;

“I think as I age I'm ever more cognizant of the fact that this love affair I have with distance running is drawing closer to a close...not so much never running again as getting to a point where the effort spent in pursuit of "doing my best" will produce times that in my mind aren't worthy of the work I must do to get them.” - Digger Carlson

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

NEVER LOOKED SO GOOD

The guy who finished 24 seconds ahead of me at the Winter Carnival Half Marathon just ran 2:55:27 (or 6:42 pace) at Boston. Since I’m shooting for 6:40 pace in June, that sounds good. However, the guy 3 seconds behind me in the same race ran 2:59:03 at Boston. I know there’s more to “it” than that, but it’s still fun to compare.

Speaking of comparisons, a guy that beat me by 1 second at the Human Race 8K ran last weekend’s 20K in 1:17:49. That’s eerily similar to my 1:17:57 from last year. So I doubt I could have run 1:17, which is the 35-39 time-standard for the Minnesota Runner of the Year rankings.

Looks like I haven’t mentioned my training in awhile. Sunday was a day off. After work on Monday, I met some of the Saturday morning group that I run with for a tour of Hyland Park (in the daylight). While I enjoyed the run and the company, it’s not an ideal time for me to run, as I got home just as the girls were going to bed. Yesterday was an easy 5 miles.

It seems like I’m always coming on here and typing “easy run” here, “easy run” there. Obviously, that wasn’t the case last Saturday and it wasn’t the case this morning. Pfitz’s plan called for 6 x 600m repeats with a 90 second recovery. Rather than beat myself up over hitting splits on the track, I decided to do these repeats on the trails. Hyland Park has a nice prairie field that includes about a 900-1000m loop. During my warm-up I calculated where I thought 600m would be. Based on my recent 8K time, McMillan says I should be doing 600m repeats between 1:55 and 2:00. Usually I’m on the slow end of the spectrum, plus I was on grass, so I figured if I ran 2:05-2:10, I’d be in the ball park. I timed the first two repeats at 2:20 and 2:22 with a recovery jog around 2:05-2:10. Good enough. I didn’t want to worry about my splits, so I stopped taking the next four. Overall, a nice VO2 max workout – especially considering it was my first one in awhile.

My latest interview is now posted. It has a little different spin than my last couple, but no less interesting.

Today’s quote of the day occurred as the group I ran with on Monday began to exit the park. It was about 75 and sunny so we all had our shirts off. A gal (who probably had no idea the average age of our group was 50-51) was entering on her bike and in a thick Russian (?) accent said;

“Fitness never looked so good.”

Monday, April 16, 2007

LAND OF LAKES

Spent part of my lunch break at the running store watching the end of the Boston Marathon coverage. I got there about 2 minutes before Robert Cheruiyot crossed the line. With the weather they had, it’ll be interesting to read some race reports.

We’ve had incredible weather here, 3 days in a row, no less. And it occurred during the weekend. It’s hard to beat that. I came “this close” to running that 20K I mentioned last week. The weather would have been perfect for racing; 40-45 sunny, calm.

However, my training partners assured me that they were up for the workout I had penciled in; 15 miles with 12 miles at 6:40 (marathon) pace. Somehow the workout morphed into 19 miles with 10 miles at MP. After a 2 mile warm-up, we ran a 6:56 mile and then from there the next 9 miles were between 6:32 and 6:45. A HUGE thanks to Kim (and her GPS) for helping push the pace during this workout.

During our cool-down we looped back to the group behind us. Somehow we got talked into running around Lake Calhoun. The talker-into’ers promised to run easy. Then once we got to Lake Calhoun, they proceeded to pull away from our 7:15 pace. Halfway around the lake, Kim and I realized our decision to follow probably wasn’t our wisest. Of course, by that time it was just as “easy” to continue on around the lake, rather than turn back.

To make matters worse, Kim and I got “lost” on the way back to our cars. We thought we were running around Lake of the Isles, but it turns out we were going around Cedar Lake. Damn, Land of 10,000 Lakes!!! So we were basically a mile less than where we thought we were. That’s not a big deal during most runs. However, when you’re only planning to run 15 miles and you’re already passed 17, it sucks.

I decided to wear my HRM in case I had to run this type of workout by myself in the future – even without mile markers, I’ll be able to have a little feedback regarding the effort I need to maintain. My HR was around 177 for most of the MP-effort. While that’s probably a little (less than 5 bpm) quick, I felt pretty comfortable.

Overall, it was a confidence boosting workout in the sense that I feel I could go out and run 6:40 pace very early in the marathon. So even though I would have loved to race 20K, I think I did the right thing.

Friday night I ended up running 6 miles. That means I had 70 miles for the week on 6 days (8 runs).

Quote of the day;

“Everyone is an athlete. The only difference is that some of us are training, and some are not.” – Dr. George Sheehan

Friday, April 13, 2007

TIMING IS EVERYTHING

Interesting timing last night; I jumped on the treadmill for 10 miles while watching the Twins game. I finished the run around the 8th inning, which left just enough time to get in some strength work. I finished that just as league MVP Justin Moreau was hitting a walk-off home run. Nice.

I’m still debating whether or not I’ll run that 20K tomorrow. I imagine it’ll be a “game day” decision – probably based on the weather (i.e. wind). The race isn’t till 9, so I could wake up at 6, check the weather and still have time to drive the hour to Rochester.

Not much else is going on. I came across a Jason Lehmkuhle interview yesterday. I also noticed that Andrew Carlson updated his journal a few days ago, along with a bunch of the Team Running USA athletes.

Quote of the day;

“You cannot dream yourself into a character; you must hammer and forge yourself one.” – James A. Froude

Thursday, April 12, 2007

NOT EXACTLY THE SAME

A week ago I asked;

If you drank a cup of coffee in the morning, a coke at lunch and a beer in the evening, how much more water would you have to drink to replenish the water you lost?
Richard responded with;

It's an even swap; fluid ounces of water for fluid ounces of diuretic in addition to your daily recommended amount of water.
It sounded good to me, but then I thought, “How can that be if different drinks have different amounts of caffeine?” If green tea has 25 mg of caffeine and black tea has 75 mg of caffeine, [note: I’m guessing on those amounts and measurements] how can it be an “even swap”?

Then last night I was reading an article in Men’s Fitness. It stated;

Another common misconception: the idea that caffeinated beverages don’t count towards hydration. While experts agree that caffeine does act as a mild diuretic, the degree to which it does so has been exaggerated… Under normal circumstances, the average guy consumes more than enough liquid each day to stay adequately hydrated... The one big exception: It’s not entirely true for someone who trains frequently for several hours at a time.
Not sure if any of that is exciting or relevant, but I thought I’d share.

I had a 15 miler planned for today, but I did not sleep well at all. Can just reading an article on caffeine keep you awake? Anyway, sometime during the night I set my alarm ahead an hour. I ran an easy 5 this morning and will get in another 10 tonight. I know it’s not exactly the same, but sometimes you have to heed the signs around you and be flexible. Besides, I do have a 13 miler under my belt already this week.

Quote of the day;

“Us runners–we live in denial. We are presently never in the shape that we imagine we once were.

Bullshit.

It’s bullshit. It’s a fallacy. The shape we imagine we were in–those grand old days, back when 20-milers came and went: they never existed. Everything’s always had a cost; everything hurt. Back when we were running those easy 20-milers, we were wishing we were in the shape of some other time, when 25-milers came and went.

We never are in the shape that we want to be in.”
- Duncan Larkin

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

ONE THING IS FOR CERTAIN

Interesting couple of responses to yesterday’s post. Evan says “you gotta follow the man, right?” and Mark says, “stick to the schedule”. Whatever happened to not just blindly following a schedule? Any schedule, even one written directly for you needs to just be a guideline, right?

Heck, I’m jumping into Pfitz’s 18 week plan with 10 weeks to go. I’ve moved stuff around within the weeks to fit into my life better. And I’ve moved stuff from week to week in order to fit my racing schedule a little better. So I guess I’m not really sticking to the schedule to begin with. But I’ll still claim to be following Pfitz’s plan.

No matter what plan I follow, one thing is for certain, there aren’t enough hours in the day. I can run the miles, go to work and spend time with my family. After that, strength training, stretching, writing, reading, interviewing, etc. it’s all a crapshoot. Seriously, by the time the girls get to bed it’s 7:30 - 8:00. That gives me about an hour of free time – at a time when I’m my most exhausted during the day, especially if I’ve been up since 4:20. “Luckily” the Twins have been playing so poorly that I don’t have to stay up watching them.

And it’s pretty tough to eat healthier when my wife makes a caramel/cinnamon roll to go with dinner. Of course, these recipes are twice what you need, so now that will be sitting on the counter for the few days. Willpower, don’t fail me now.

Just an easy 7 miles this morning, amongst the snow flurries.

Quote of the day;

“Strange how people who suffer together have stronger connections than people who are most content.” – Bob Dylan

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

PICK YOUR BATTLES

One of the weird things about Pfitz is that after starting the week off with a recovery/cross-training day, he follows it with a double day of 6 and 4 miles. I assume he’s a big believer in recovery and that’s why he just doesn’t schedule two 5 mile days. But I thought he’d lean towards one 10 mile run instead of splitting that mileage into two runs.

It’s not really a big deal to me as each has their own pros and cons. The pros of splitting my mileage up yesterday are; 1) I get to sleep in longer, 2) it feels like another recovery day, 3) with a PM run, I’m more likely to do some strength training and 4) I don’t feel so guilty for watching TV if I’m on the treadmill.

So yesterday ended up being 6 miles in the morning with 6 x 30 second strides added in and 4 miles in the evening. This week’s schedule has two medium-long runs during the week, instead of just one. That means I was up at 4:20 today so I could get in a 13 miler.

Overall, I’m feeling pretty good. My right knee still aches a little, but not enough to bother me while I’m running. I was thinking about doing a 20K race this weekend, but I think I’m going to pass on that. The main reason is because I’m meeting some friends for dinner and I don’t want to be gone all morning and all evening. Sometimes you have to pick your battles. Besides, Pfitz has a 12 mile marathon-paced workout on the schedule. 12 miles at MP is a different animal than 12.4 miles all-out. Maybe I’ll change my mind. We’ll see.

Quote of the day;

“You’ve got to get up every morning with determination if you are going to go to bed with satisfaction.” – George Horace Lorimer

Monday, April 09, 2007

LOW-KEY

Friday was an easy 5 miler. Saturday I participated in a Ron Daws 25K. I wish more races were like this; $4 entry fee, no shirts, water and cookies at the finish, two awards (first male and first female) – very low-key. Going into this event, it was just going to be a training run. Instead of meeting for a group run, my training group decided just to meet at this event. Given the conditions (15-20 degrees and very windy) and the hilly course, not racing was a very good idea. Kim and I ended up running together. I don’t remember our finish time (something like 1:51), but I think our pace was right around 7:10. Warm-up and cool-down gave me 19 for the day and 61 for the week on 6 runs.

Yesterday I continued with my new trend of taking a day off each week. I thought about riding my bike, but never got around to it.

I’m still working on the “diet thing.” I controlled myself at Easter lunch – for the most part. And I started to re-read Nancy Clark’s book.

That’s all for today. Go check out my latest interview.

Quote of the day;

"I think you could take the guys running the [Olympic] Marathon Trials in November, throw them in a 100k and half of them would run as well or better than I have."Patrick Russell

Friday, April 06, 2007

REALITY RUNNERS - PART 1

Nothing new to report today, so I thought I'd share another article I wrote for the MDRA magazine. Last time I introduced 7 runners I'll be tracking throughout the year. Below is the first installment of that series.

Reality Runners by Chad Austin

This is part one in a new ongoing series we’re publishing this year. In the last issue of RunMinnesota we introduced you to seven runners we’ll be tracking throughout the year. In each issue we will feature one or two of the runners and give brief updates on the others. In this issue we’re featuring Karen Spandl who is Boston-bound after 33 years of running and Amanda Bowman who missed all of the 2006 racing season due to injuries.

In this day and age when it seems like every new runner wants to run a marathon four months after their very first run, Karen Spandl took a different approach. She waited 31 years before making her marathon debut. At the age of 12, Karen decided to go out for the track team. Not knowing what events she would like, she figured just logging some miles would put her ahead of the game. She was hooked from the start and said “I found that I really enjoyed taking off, by myself for a run. That is when I was in my true element. Every summer, my miles increased more and more. I found myself running in rain, sleet, snow or 30 mph winds.”

Karen’s early training paid off as she began setting school records and eventually won a state title as part of a mile relay team. After high school she was recruited to run cross-country and track at Minnesota State University-Mankato. Even though Karen got married after one year of college and had a beautiful baby girl two years later, she always came back to the track to run and compete.

In the 20 years following college, Karen continued to run a lot of miles, but she never had the urge to race; “I loved the carefree attitude of running for my health. It was stress-free, as no one’s training schedule dictated my route, distance or speed. Self-satisfaction and the “high” I got from running was all I needed to keep me feeling content. Running was the one time during the day that I couldn’t get interrupted by any demands.”

Like for many people, the 20 years after college proved to be very busy for Karen as she gave birth to two more boys, started a career and went to graduate school. Then the children’s activities were becoming more and more time consuming. Karen had to squeeze in runs between practices, meets, and games.

Then in 2004, it happened. Karen met another hockey mom who ran half and full marathons. As they say, “Misery loves company.” Her new friend tried to convince Karen to run a marathon with her. She said, “I was not sold on the idea of running a marathon. But, I realized deep down in my heart, it was always a dream of mine.” In addition to being a dream, Karen found another reason to train for her first marathon; she needed an emotional outlet, stating, “I suddenly found myself single, after being married for 25 years. Running became cheap therapy!”

Karen decided on the inaugural Fargo Marathon in 2005. Like all sane runners, she promised herself that it would be a one-time thing; she would run one marathon, accomplish her dream and retire from marathons. Of course, her new running friends knew different, telling her that she’d be hooked. They were right and they were part of the reason Karen was hooked. “I had so much fun during that marathon and the training leading up to it. I was in awe with the support and friendships that developed from this kind of competition. It was completely different from my previous years of competition,” she said.

Karen ran just under 4:07 in her first attempt at the distance. In 2006, she set her sights on qualifying for the Boston Marathon at the Twin Cities Marathon. Needing a 3:50 marathon to meet her age-group standard, Karen improved by exactly 20 minutes, running just under 3:47. As a result, her third attempt at the distance will be in Beantown this year.

As many Minnesota runners have discovered, training through the winter for an April marathon can prove to be quite challenging; falling temperatures/rising mileage, shorter days/longer long runs, more and more snow/fewer and fewer runners on the roads. It can be a daunting task. Karen feels confident that even though she didn’t get in as much speedwork as she would have liked, she did put in the miles necessary to run as fast as her qualifying time. She’d like to average 8:30/mile pace to finish in 3:43 and set a PR along the way, something she’s done in every race she’s entered since her return to competitive running.

Whether or not Karen keeps her PR string alive at Boston won’t affect her view of life and running, she said, “I have come to realize that running is just a metaphor for life. Some days it is easy and the sun is shining with the wind on your back. Other days, it can be a hard run, up hill, with lots of aches and pains and the rain is hitting you in the face. But, whatever the day brings, I will always run to continue to find out who I am. I just keep enjoying and appreciating my physical health and thank God for the ability to run and still enjoy it. If Boston turns out to be my day for a disappointment, so be it. There will always be another race and another challenge!”

In our next issue, we will let you know how Karen did at Boston.

Amanda Bowman, 27, of Circle Pines started running in 2004. As with many new runners, she was hooked from the start and couldn’t get enough. That first year, she entered several 10K and half marathon races and even a 20 miler. After placing in her age group at some of the smaller races, she was eager to see what was in store for 2005. Little did she know that a series of injuries awaited her just around the corner.

When Spring 2005 rolled around, Amanda’s eagerness got the best of her and she over-trained. First, it was her IT band. After getting that in-check with the help of a chiropractor and some stretching exercises, she thought she was on the mend. But then she started feeling soreness in her right quad and hamstring. This time she said, “Since I was out of money, I kept up my stretches, used my foam roller and ran twice a week. This strategy worked and with the support of MDRA’s Fall Marathon Training group, I successfully completed the Twin Cities Marathon in 3:49.”

After the marathon, things got even worse as 2006 turned out to be a yearlong roller coaster ride of emotions. The pain in Amanda’s right leg continued and she searched desperately for a cure or, at the very least, a cause. After several chiropractor, physical therapist, and orthopedist appointments, she walked away hopeful, but ended up broken hearted. Even a trip to the Mayo Clinic, as part of their Runner’s Program, didn’t provide the answers Amanda was looking for. After being observed on a treadmill, the physical therapist said the position of her hips was very restrictive and caused her right knee to tilt inward and her right foot to point outward. Fixing that would make the problem worse, since it wasn’t her natural movement. Again, she left feeling very disappointed, since she wasn’t told my pain could be fixed.

By now, Amanda was becoming emotionally and physically tired from all her attempts and failures to run. She made the difficult decision to skip Grandma’s Marathon. Given the pain she was in, she just wanted to get back to pain-free running and experiencing a “runner’s high” again. She said, “I remember feeling so powerful and confident. I could go as fast as I wanted and run for miles and miles. I got in my groove and nothing could stop me. What will it take for me to experience that happiness again?”

Well, with a new year, there’s new hope. Recently, a friend insisted that Amanda see one last chiropractor, Dr. Steven Moe. This time she arrived at her appointment with absolutely no expectations, but left with a heart full of hope. After an hour of balancing on a Bosu ball and standing on one foot while tilting her head, the doctor came to the conclusion that the entire right side of Amanda’s body was weak. With the help of some strength exercises and balance drills, along with some soft tissue work by Dr. William Carter, Amanda is on the road to recover. She said, “I have a long way to go before I’m 100%, but I think I’m getting closer. When I run, I take it slow, as speed is not a priority. I only wish I could go further than 5 miles without having something in my right leg hurt.”

To prove that Amanda is determined to accomplish her goals, she has signed up for Grandma’s Marathon again. In our next issue, we’ll see how well she’s progressing.

Braden Beam, 40, of St. Louis Park is currently training for his first Ironman. Most of his training throughout the winter was of the aerobic variety, which he describes as the easy, boring, uninteresting base training stage. For a Minnesota Ironman-in-training, that means hitting the pool 2-3 times per week, including swims up to two miles, biking on the indoor trainer a couple of times a week, including an intense class, and running 20 miles per week. Then, throw in lifting once a week and yoga twice a week, just for good measure.

Braden started to ramp up his training in April, especially his bike. Given that half of his race will consist of time on his bike, Braden will spend the next few months focusing on improving that leg of his triathlon. Coincidentally, April is also when his life began consisting almost exclusively of work and exercise, with a small smattering of social activities. Such is life for someone planning to complete an 11-13 hour event, four months away.

Last August, Kerry Rosane, 26 of Oronoco gave birth to her first child. Now she feels in better shape than ever and is eager for the spring racing season, so she can prove it. She has two marathons and two half Ironmans on her schedule for the year.

If the time crunch of a baby and training weren’t hard enough, Kerry has to deal with the fact that her husband is training for an Ironman. As Braden pointed out, it’s not really a big deal in the middle of winter. However, with spring in the air, triathletes are usually eager to get out on their bikes, for long periods of time.

While Kerry is confident about her fitness, it hasn’t come without complications throughout the winter. She dealt with lower back problems, as well as a sick child, which made getting in her training more difficult. She said, “Some days I wish I were not training but rather just working out to work out. I think I would get less frustrated when I don't get in quality workouts.”

Marc Windahl, 41, of Fargo, ND is in the middle of two large goals; 1) running his first marathon in May and 2) continuing a weight loss plan that has seen him lose 50 pounds in the last ten months.

Training for the Fargo Marathon has been up and down, including a health scare and the passing of a kidney stone. After getting a clean bill of health, Marc was back on track with his weekly mileage and long runs. Like most first-time marathoners, he admits to having fears and doubts about his ability to run 26.2 miles. He said, "I keep telling myself that a little pain now with long training runs will let me accomplish it
with less pain in May."

With the help of his training, his weight is still slowly coming off. "It seems to plateau and then drop. The main thing is to keep focused on the long-term and keep plugging away," he said. He plans to be below 220 pounds for the first time in 15 years when he steps to the line on May 19th.

Keenan Robbins, 23, of Mankato was hoping to return to a "decent level" of running this spring. Unfortunately, his indoor track season at Minnesota State-Mankato was non-existent. He said, "I just didn't get in the proper work that would leave me feeling confident and ready to race. I don't like to hit the track without a solid foundation of rhythm runs and hills, because I feel I need a solid muscular and aerobic foundation to prepare myself for the harder work on the track."

Keenan, who left a job with Nike in order to return to MSU has recently decided to return to Nike and move back to the Portland area. He stated, “John Truax at Nike is the driving force behind a lot of great things in Grassroots Running right now – things that are real, authentic, and full of passion for the sport. I felt it essential to be involved.”

The good news is Angie Voight, 30, of Minneapolis is fresh off a 2:58:13 PR at the Chevron Houston Marathon in January. The bad news is she's still 11 minutes away from her goal of qualifying for the Olympic Trials Marathon. On the bright side, Houston was run on less than ideal training. After about a month of solid mileage, Angie's knee began giving her problems. To hold it in-check, she began running every few days and then taking a few days off. Eventually she wasn't running at all. After taking two weeks completely off, Angie found herself only four weeks away from the race. "I had decided that I would cancel my trip to Houston because I didn't think I could finish the marathon or worse yet, that I would embarrass myself with my finishing time," she said. At the last minute, Angie changed her mind. For the race, she went out slowly, tried to stay relaxed and did not worry about her time. In the process, she learned this lesson, "I guess you don't always need ideal training to run a PR."

There you have it, part one of our yearlong series. Check out our next issue where we’ll feature two more runners, in addition to updates on the others.

Thursday, April 05, 2007

WITHOUT EVEN THINKING ABOUT IT

I didn’t have to drop anyone off at the airport like last week, so I got to “sleep in” till 4:15 today. It was “much” nicer than yesterday; 19 degrees, but the windchill was 8. I guess that’s better than 2. Actually with all the snow having melted, it didn’t seem that cold. I just bundled up and hit the trails for a nice 15 miler. After follow Pfitz for the first time, I said I knew I was fit when I could bust out a 15 miler in the middle of the week without even thinking about it. I’m getting there.

I’ve been giving a lot more thought to my diet lately. In the past I thought it’d be nice to eat better to help my running. But then I’d think, “I am a 37 year old nobody, how much faster will I really run by cutting chocolate from my diet?” And, of course, my diet never changed. Now I’m thinking, “I’m 37 years old, I should eat better for me, not for running.”

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not stopping at McDonald’s everyday or eating a sleeve of Doublestuff Oreos in one sitting. But I think there are some things I can improve on, like taking 1-2 chocolates instead of 3-4, drinking more water, adding in some green tea, instead of coffee. I think one of the keys is to go about changing gradually. Also, I give myself a little pat on the back when I pass up those Girl Scout cookies before dinner.

Speaking of diet, I know caffeine and alcohol are diuretics. But I’m wonder if you drank a cup of coffee in the morning, a coke at lunch and a beer in the evening, how much more water would you have to drink to replenish the water you lost?

I found this article on some of the top Minnesota women from the ‘80s awhile ago, but never got around to posting it

Finally, here’s the real reason we went to Chicago in the fall. Luckily, there happened to be a marathon taking place on the same day.



Quote of the day;

“Right now I feel like I could run through a brick wall and just keep on going. It will be imperative that I rein in this energy, allowing it to accrue until I turn it loose little by little on race day. Easier said than done.”Patrick Russell

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

SIMPLE MATH

Thomas had a good comment when I mentioned that I was switching to Pfitz’s plan, which advocates a day off per week;

I can't believe I'm reading this on the blog of the same guy who once argued that a rest day per week equals nearly 2 missed months of training a year.
First off, you CAN’T argue that a rest day per week DOESN’T equal nearly 2 missing months of training a year. It’s simple math; 1 day per week times 52 weeks equals 52 days of missed training. That’s nearly 2 missed months of training a year.

I know, I know, that’s not what Thomas was getting at. Here are my thoughts; 1) I’ve had success with Pfitz in the past, 2) in the first 3 months of the year I’ve averaged 2 days off a month, so going to 4 days off a month isn’t that much different, 3) running tired and not taking rest days in the middle of winter’s base-building phase is different than not taking rest days when you’re in the heart of your marathon prep, and 4) I’m going to take the approach of one of the people I interview recently who said when he cut his mileage he found that he attacked his workouts harder.

Besides, I can read all I want about running more versus incorporating rest days, but there’s really only one way to find out what works for me. I figure if incorporating a rest day a week, at this point, increases my chances of getting to the start line healthy, fresh and full of gumption, then it’s worth it, especially given my track record for getting a little beat up heading into key races.

Last night I jumped on the treadmill for 11 miles, including 7 at 6:25 pace. That’s probably a tad slow for half marathon pace, but since I’d been running similar workouts at 6:45 pace, I wanted to error on the side of a little too slow. After the workout I realized I was only supposed to run 6 miles hard. Oh well, extra credit.

This morning I woke up to a windchill of 2 degrees! The strong winds literally took my breath away. Luckily I only had to run an easy 5 miles.










This is how a windchill of 2 degrees causes kids to bundle up (actually it was taken earlier this winter).

Quote of the day;

“Not the race, but the runner. The enemy, as always, is within.” – George Sheehan

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

LOST MILES

Yesterday I mentioned the World X-C Champions in Kenya. I forgot to ask if anyone else thinks it’s weird that this meet was run on a golf course – in Kenya? That juxtaposition just seems very odd to me.

I ran 6 miles yesterday morning and threw in some strides. I was supposed to run another 4 in the evening, but my wife wanted me to help with a resume and cover letter for a gal that’s interning for her. I wish I could just take a quick peek and say it looks okay, but I can’t. I ended up spending 45 minutes revising a 2-page resume down to 1-page.

Then I was going to get up this morning to make up for those “lost” miles, before running hard tonight. Well, staying up to 10:30, watching a mediocre championship game, didn’t help matters. I slept in. So 2.5 days into April and I’ve run 6 miles. No worries though. I’ll run hard tonight, medium-long on Thursday and long Saturday.

Just when I was beginning to wonder if I’d ever post another interview (not really), this interview arrived in my in-box. Thanks to Patrick for helping me get in touch with this runner. I’ll keep this post short, so you can spend your time reading it instead.

Quote of the day;

“I’ve told myself in the past that if I ever broke four, I was going to stop running. I guess I’ll probably reconsider now, but it has definitely been one of my biggest goals up to this point.” - Garrett Heath

Monday, April 02, 2007

SEASON OPENER

My daughter had a kindergarten concert Friday afternoon, so I just took the whole day off from work. I met up with Jim and Eric for a wet 11-mile run along the river roads. Along the way we passed Team USA Minnesota. Unfortunately, it was “just” the guys. And when I say “passed” I mean we were going in opposite directions – not to be confused with us running faster than them. Speaking of the team, here’s a nice article regarding my favorite male runner’s trip to Kenya for the World X-C Championships.

Saturday was another miserable run in the rain, or I should say, another run in the miserable rain. The run was nice, the rain was miserable. I managed my second 2+ hour run in three days, another 15 miler. That run gave me 74 for the week and it means I closed the books on March with 293 miles.

How can you not like Pfitz’s plan? Any plan that starts off with a rest day is okay with me. I decided to take Mark’s advice and “just” follow the 70 mpw plan. Lately, my training has included a longer (15+ miles) run on Saturday, followed by a 10-12 miler on Sunday. Well, Pfitz starts the week off with a rest or cross-train day. Having run 41 miles in the last 3 days, I wasn’t going to argue with him. I took yesterday off and didn’t worry about it at all. In the evening, I did some core work, stretching and foam rolling.

The NCAA hoops championship is tonight and the Twins kick off their regular season. Sweet!

Quote of the day;

“If there is no wind, row.” – Latin Proverb

Thursday, March 29, 2007

AT FOUR AM!!!

Last Thursday I happened to be wide awake at 4:30, so I decided to add a medium-long run to my week. However, my Achilles acted up and I had to limit the run to 7 miles. This morning I had to take some friend to the airport…AT FOUR AM!!! Actually, my wife was going to take them, but I figured if I dropped them off then I could take another crack at a medium-long run.

Everything worked out. I felt really good and was able to run for 2:04, which I’ll call 15 miles. About half of the run was on the Hyland Park trails. I think normally these would un-runable at the end of March. However, due to our relative lack of snow and our early-season heatwave, the trails were in awesome shape. That bodes well for the 25K that I’ll be running on those same trails on April 21st.

I’ve been kicking around ideas regarding what training plan I want to follow leading up to Grandma’s Marathon. I had thoughts of adding in a 2-3 week Lydiard-like Hill Phase. However, due to a few factors, I’ve decided against that; 1) the way my calf, Achilles and knee have been lately, 2) the race is 11 weeks away, and 3) in the last couple of years I think my Hill Phase was too long. Besides I had a stretch of 10 weeks where I did 9 hill workouts.

I’m going to go back to following Pfitz. I haven’t decided if I’ll follow the 70 mpw plan (which seems a little low) or the 70+ mpw plan (which seems a little high). I may just split the difference. Since the first part of his plan is base-work, I’m just going to jump in as if I’d been following his schedule all along. Guess what his medium-long run for the week is? 15 miles! And I didn’t even know that prior to today’s run.

When I wrote this article on Jim, Don, and Norm nearly 5 months ago, Jim suggested I submit it to some of the smaller local papers near where they live. I put it off and put it off, but finally got around to contacting three different papers. Two said they were interested. So far the Stillwater Gazette is the only one to take action.


Pretty cool. At least I think so.

Quote of the day;

“Above all, challenge yourself. You may well surprise yourself at what strengths you have, what you can accomplish.” – Cecile M. Springer

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

WEIGHING HEAVILY

I had a lunchtime meetings, so not much time to write. However, something has been weighing heavily on my mind lately, but I keep forgetting to post on it. I really want to know if there’s an uglier logo than the one the NCAA uses? Are you telling me they couldn’t come up with something better than a blue circle with NCAA written in it? Every time I watch a tournament game, that big blue dot annoys me. I guess all the creative students go to vocational schools.

Anyway, I’m happy to report that I’m feeling pretty good. No more pain in my Achilles. My trigger point no longer hurts. My knee is still a little achy, but hopefully that’ll continue to get better as my other aches disappear.

I thought about getting in a hill workout yesterday, but since I slept in that pretty much ruled that out. Instead, I decided on some tempo work last night. I’ve been doing some longer (7-8 miles) runs at marathon pace lately. Last night I thought I’d mix it up a little with shorter reps, but faster. I was planning 3 x 2 miles with a couple of minutes rest in-between. I hit the first one in 6:15 pace and then took a 2:30 rest. I think I let the pace of the second one get a little too quick. I started breathing pretty hard for a tempo, so I backed off a little toward the end, again finishing in 6:15 pace. 2:15 rest wasn’t enough, as I was struggling with the third rep. I decided to call it a workout after a mile in 6:17. Throw in a couple mile cooldown and I got in 10 miles for the day.

This morning I ran an easy 6 mile recovery run in the rain – so much for 80 and sunny.

Quote of the day;

“There’ll be two buses leaving the hotel for the ballpark tomorrow. The 2 PM bus will be for those of you who need a little extra work. The empty bus will leave at 5 PM.” – Dave Bristol

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

BEER WEATHER

If there was better weather yesterday somewhere in the world than the Twin Cities, I want to hear about it; 80 degrees, sunny, light breeze, low humidity, no bugs. That’s the kind of weather that makes me want to drink beer.

Unfortunately, a couple of beers led to a trip to the bathroom in the middle of the night. That led to me being unable to get back to sleep for what seemed like 2 hours. As a result, morning came early and I was still tired. Even after feeding the dog, brushing my teeth and checking the weather, I couldn’t drag myself out the door. I went back to bed, so I’ll have to run tonight.

My last couple of posts, along with a recent article published locally, entitled “Development of Optimum Stride Length” got me thinking about the ancillary training that I could do to improve my running. I always hear about runners who have imbalances, which lead to injuries. It makes me wonder what my deficiencies are and if I could improve if certain areas were more flexible or stronger. Could I run the same or better with less mileage but more ancillary work? Would I be less prone to injuries?

The article I mentioned above gave a list of exercises and drills designed to “reduce ground contact time.” Included in the list are things like crunches, bounding, power skips, barefoot running, etc. These things always sound great on paper, but I rarely find myself following through on them.

It’d be nice if there was a (cheap) way to figure all this stuff out. What works and what doesn’t work. And it’d be cool if there was a way to quantify these types of things. That way you could rank-order the various exercises in order of importance.

Quote of the day;

“Concentration is the ability to think about absolutely nothing when it is absolutely necessary.” – Ray Knight

Monday, March 26, 2007

BEING TESTED

Ever feel that you’re just being tested? I used to think that race results were basically just a matter of motivation; runs lots and get good race results, let motivation wane and results will suffer. Of course, that’s still true, but other factors sure seem to be more and more prevalent as I age. Since I’m no longer 20 years old, jumping on injuries as soon as possible seems to be more and more important.

Looking back at last year’s log book, I started the first 3.5 month of the year by averaging over 80 mpw. For me, that was huge, consistent mileage. Unfortunately, I spent the next 2.5 months struggling with an injury. Rather than seeking help immediately and treating it aggressively, I hemmed and hawed. I’d take a few days off or cross-train, then I’d throw in a few hour-long runs and then, come the weekend, I’d run 20 miles. Of course, I wasn’t heeled, and I’d repeat the cycle again. This lasted 4-5 weeks before I declared myself injured.

What are those 12 steps? Denial? Acceptance? Wikipedia says these steps are part of the process;

• admitting that one has a serious, uncontrollable problem;
• recognizing that a higher (spiritual) power can help;
• inventorying and admitting character defects;
• asking one's higher power for deliverance from these defects;
• making amends to those one has harmed; and
• helping others with the same problem.

This year I've vowed to change. As I mentioned in my last post, I didn’t think the pain I’ve been experiencing lately was due to my Achilles Heel. The pain was there, but the “normal” symptoms weren’t. No swelling. No tenderness to the touch. It wasn’t painful right from the start of my run. The final sign was when I ice-massaged that area on Friday, it sent “shockwaves” across the bottom of my foot, to my toes.

Time to seek out my “higher power”.

I called Jenna and she was kind enough to give me a treatment on Saturday. She was able to find a nasty trigger point in my upper calf. I’ve been icing, massaging and foam rolling that area all weekend. It seems to really have helped. I was able to run 9 on Saturday and 11 on Sunday. This morning I ran an easy 6 miles and threw in 5-6 strides. While I’m no longer experiencing pain in my Achilles, I’m not quite ready to declare victory yet. I’ve been experiencing some constant achy pain in my knee lately. My guess is that it’s due to the trigger point in my calf. I’ll continue to monitor it.

Since I’m normally on here bitching about the weather, it’s only fair that I praise it once in awhile too. The last few days have been incredible; mid-60s to 70, sunny, light breeze. Today is supposed to approach the record high of 74. It’s hard to believe that just a few weeks ago I was talking about how great 26 degrees felt.

Quote of the day;

“Those who say that I will lose and am finished will have to run over my body to beat me.” – Said Aouita

Thursday, March 22, 2007

GOOD AS IT GETS

I had a nice 8 mile run on the treadmill last night and was ready to proclaim, “No harm, no foul” regarding my Achilles. This morning I was wide awake at 4:30, so I decided to get up and get in a longer run. The mid-week, medium-long run is one things that’s fallen by the wayside during the cold months. Today was the perfect opportunity to reintroduce it. Unfortunately, just like Tuesday, my right Achilles acted up about 4-5 miles into the run. At least I was wise enough not to have an out-and-back course planned. I ran on it for a couple more miles, getting in 7 for the day.

It seems weird because Achilles pain is usually there, or it’s not. I don’t remember it being something that would flare up after 40 minutes of running. Oh well, it’s happened on two of the last three runs, so I’ll have to monitor/treat it. It doesn’t seem swollen or tender to the touch, and doesn’t hurt walking.

Alright, enough about that. Looking through the results from Sunday had me doing my best Jack Nicholson imitation, “Is this as good as it gets?” I’d like to see a study that looks at how runners race times change over time. I’m wondering if people, in general, finish with similar time from year to year. Of course, you have to take into account things like how new they are to the sport, age, etc. For example, here are my results over the years from the same 8K;

2000 - 30:09 – 30 years old
2001 - 29:52 – 31 y.o.
2002 - 29:20 – 32 y.o.
2004 - 30:44 – 34 y.o.
2005 - 29:56 – 35 y.o.
2006 - 29:15 – 36 y.o.
2007 - 29:33 – 37 y.o.

Part of me is happy to not be slowing down during the last 8 years, but part of me thinks stuff like, “Where’s the breakthrough?” Then I think, “Given that I’m already behind last year, is it possible to have a good year?” Of course, I think I can, otherwise I just wasted the last 5 months of training. If I don’t have a good year, then maybe it’s time to throw caution to the wind and shake up my training. I mean, if the “same ole’ same ole’” is always going to lead to 29:33, I either need to 1) learn to be happy with those results or 2) figure out a way to improve them, even if it means increasing my chance of injury.

Again, enough about me. Chris Lundstrom has updated his journal. And believe it or not, some of the Mammoth Lakes, CA group has too; Ryan Hall, Sara Hall, and Deena Kastor.

Quote of the day;

“One of these days and it won't be long
Going down in the valley and sing my song
I will sing it loud and sing it strong
Let the echo decide if I was right or wrong”

- Bob Dylan, Silvio

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

NO NEWS IS NO NEWS

No news regarding my Achilles. I slept in this morning I will give it a go on the treadmill tonight. It feels fine walking around the office – I don’t even think about it – so that’s a good thing.

As readers of my blog, some of you may consider yourself privy to the articles I’ve been writing for the MDRA’s magazine. Of course, others probably don’t give a damn, especially if you don’t live in Minnesota. Well, it’s that time again. Below is an article I just finished about the history surround the club, the Minnesota running scene and the magazine. Thanks to Jim and Eric for providing some, much needed, feedback on my (very) rough draft.

The Minnesota folks may want to wait 2 months until it’s in print. The non-Minnesota folks may have already hit their “back” button. In either case, if you make it all the way to the end, there will be a cool “link” waiting for you – for you listening pleasure.

MINNESOTA DISTANCE RUNNING HISTORY (not the actual title)
Maybe you missed it. I know I nearly did. As I did a little research for this article in early March, I noticed that it was the same day that the MDRA was born, March 12th. Happy 46th Birthday, MDRA, or as it was called back then, MRRC – Minnesota Road Runner’s Club.

As I wrote in my last article, I may not be a history buff, in general, but I love to read about running history. That got me thinking, “What’s the history behind the beginning of the MDRA? What was the Minnesota running scene like at that time? And how has the magazine you’re holding in your hands changed over time?” This article will try and take us back to the ‘60s and ‘70s to shed some light on those questions.

Is there a better way to start a running club than with a race? The “5 mile” race (later measured to be 4.6 miles) was held at the Columbia Golf Course and seven runners finished. After the race, the club held its first meeting, in the friendly confines of the parking lot. During that first year of existence the club had nine dues paying members and put on 14 races. By the end of the second year, memberships (20) outnumbered races (17). While MDRA still continues to organize about 20 races a year, their real growth has been in the number of memberships, which are approaching 3,000.

You may have heard of some of the races sponsored by MRRC at that time; Fred Kurz Memorial 10-mile Handicap Race, which is arguably the oldest continuously run race in the Midwest. I say arguably because some people give that title to the Lake Johanna 4 miler, which actually moved from the Columbia Golf Course, site of the club’s first race. There was also the Raspberry 5 miler, which still takes place every July in Hopkins. As for marathons, the 1963 Land of Lakes Marathon was the first marathon in the Twin Cities in over 50 years. The race had five entrants and three finishers. That’s a far cry from marathoning in Minnesota as we know it today.

While those three events are fairly “normal”, the same can’t be said for every race during that timeframe. Apparently the ‘60s and ‘70s were a popular time for racing on the track and relay races. For example, here are some events that you just don’t see anymore; 10-mile, 20K and 1-hour, where runners try to run as far as possible in 60 minutes, all on the track. As for relays, there was the 2-man/10-mile relay where runners alternated 440 yard repeats and the 24-hour relay where teams of 10 alternated running mile repeats for an entire day.

Even other events that were “normal” had strange things about them. For one, Certification didn’t seem to be a big deal as numerous races were run at unique distances. I found results for races ranging from 1.3 miles to 8.2 miles to the Jackrabbit “15” which was certified at 15.202 miles. And it’s not just the distances that were unique, the categories were as well; sure there was the open race, but there were also races specifically for girls, coaches, women and even joggers. In one such event, the first three finishers were not eligible for awards because they finished under the “jogger minimum” time limit of 12 minutes for the 2 mile “race”.

Obviously with all these races, the club needed a way to disseminate news and information to its members. In 1967, this magazine – known as the Minnesota Distance Runner newsletter, at the time – was born. It was billed as, “an infrequent, but worthwhile publication of the MRRC.” And it was “published at infrequent intervals 4 times yearly according to the mood, whim or training schedule of the editors.” Keep in mind that 1967 was prior to the internet-age. Therefore, the newsletter was the best and probably only place where runners could find a race schedule, entry forms, and results. They could also find an occasional article within the pages of the newsletter, like “Heat Hazards to Runners” and “Living with Winter Weather.” An interesting side note; this was the same year that another publication, Distance Running News, was also born. You probably recognize it as Runner’s World.

Overall, those newsletters were really no different than today’s RunMinnesota. What was different was the overall feel of the newsletter. Given the relatively small number of runners at the time, the newsletter had a distinct close-knit feel to it. There was a lot of “inside” information distributed throughout the issues. In some instances the newsletter was even used to “call people out.” For example, they published a list of names whose memberships would expire “if they don’t fork it over.”

Another example was aimed at a race director, “If you’re looking for the race results for the trackorama 10,000 meter race, so are we. Race director Ron Daws has still to turn in the results (nearly 3 months now). In case you’d like to express your concern…” The article proceeded to list Ron’s home phone number. This was definitely an interesting approach. It’s even more interesting if you take into account that Ron Daws was Olympian Ron Daws. Try and imagine this magazine chastising a current Olympian and then listing their home phone number, and nowadays, email address, so you could voice your displeasure directly.

In addition to “outing” people, the newsletter was also used to remind runners to be safe. A somber example; “Remember that damned few of the driving public are track fans and you’re in an awfully poor position to argue about your right of way with 3500 pounds of steel and glass coming your way at 50 mph.”

I mentioned that the newsletter was the best place to find race results at that time. Looking through these old results, three things jumped out at me. First, some people have been involved with the sport for a long time, like; past MDRA presidents, Jack Moran, Rick Recker, and Dave Kuehn, Dennis Hahn, whose photos often grace the pages of another local running magazine, top local coaches Dennis Barker (Team USA Minnesota and Augsburg College), Steve Plasencia (University of Minnesota), Scott Christensen (Stillwater), Rick Kleyman (Armstrong), and Grandma’s Marathon Race Director Scott Keenan. I won’t disclose their ages. Let’s just say all their names appeared in the race results a long time ago.

Second, lots of today’s top runners followed in the footsteps of other family members; recent Olympic Trails Marathon qualifiers Mike Reneau and Pete Gilman have fathers (Jeff and Allen, respectively) whose names appeared near the top of the results 30-some years ago. A quick scan of recent results shows they’re still finishing near the top of their age group. Another name from the past is Greg Yetzer, father of probably the fastest sister-trio around, Rebekah, Annie, and Elizabeth. Of course their mother, Mary, an outstanding runner in her own right, probably had something to do with their speed. One last name that I easily recognized was Kempainen; only this time it was Olympian Bob’s older brother Todd. Knowing how this sport works, I’m sure there are many other similar examples that I missed.

Finally, prior to looking over the results, I was sure that I’d see Olympians Ron Daws and Garry Bjorklund, along with sub-2:12 marathoner, Steve Hoag’s name at the top of every race. While they did win their fair share, there we a lot of other guys winning too, like Tom Hoffman, LaVerne Dunsmore, Chuck Burrows, Glen Herold, Chuck Ceronsky and Don Timm. When I asked Hoag about that he said; “Yes, winning was pretty spread out, due to the talent here. Interestingly, for every name you mentioned here, I can come up with 3 or 4 names equally as good; Mike Slack, Garrett Tomczak, Bruce Mortenson, Jim Ferstle, Dennis Barker, Mike Seaman, Van Nelson, etc. There was incredible talent in this area at that time, and deep.”

Hoag went on to mention how the following local women were also nationally recognized; Jan Arenz, Val Rogosheske, Alex Boies, and Jill Hanson. These are the women that would blaze a trail for other top local women, including; Olympian Janis Klecker, Grandma’s Marathon and Twin Cities Marathon Champion Jan Ettle, and the one and only 6-time Olympic Trials Marathon finisher, Bev Docherty, just to name a few.

While the MDRA is going strong, it wasn’t always clear how much the club would prosper. Even 13 years after helping to start the club, Pat Lanin had reservations about where it would go from there, “I don’t see MDRA dying. I think that it’s going to make it. If I had really built up an organization that was worthwhile, it’ll keep running long after I’d stepped down. I think that the thing is viable on its own and it should, hopefully, last. There are just too many people who at least seem interested enough not to let it go. I can’t imagine it dying.”

Indeed there have been, and still are, people interested enough in the MDRA to not let it die. Whether you were at that first club meeting or just became a member, you are responsible for the club’s success. Here’s to the next 46 years.

Alright, as promised (hopefully you didn’t just skip ahead), check out Pandora.com. It allows you to key in a musician and then it creates a play list of similar artists – for free. I’m not positive how they determine “similar artists”. The other day I punched in Neil Young and an hour later I was listening to Hole. But if you're in need of some new music while at your computer, check it out. Thanks to Scott for the link.

Quote of the day;

“Mind is everything: muscle – pieces of rubber. All that I am, I am because of my mind.” – Paavo Nurmi

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

RACE EVALUATION

Can’t believe I forgot to mention Sonya Decker’s name yesterday in the list of people I’ve interview. She was breathing down my neck with a 29:46. It was her first time sub-30 in 10 years and good enough to win the Master’s division.

After my last race, I mentioned the questionnaire that I fill out after racing. I’ve been kind of hit-or-miss with it in the past. I’m trying to be more vigilant this year, so here it is for Sunday’s race;

Name of race: Human Race
Date and Time: 3/18/07, 1:20 PM
Location: St. Paul, Summit Ave. out-and-back
Distance: 8K
Competition: Road Race - MN 8K championship
Weeks since last race: 7 weeks
Weather and course conditions: 30-35 degrees, Mod S/SE wind, 70% headwind
Goals: Time - Beat last year's 29:15, possible sub-29. Non-time - Execute race strategy.
Race strategy and possible mishaps and contingencies: Get a good start, focus more internally and use the downhill during the 2nd mile. Stay out of traffic around Wm. Mitchell. Gain energy from the people heading out. Drive the hill in the 4th mile and then use the downhill from Snelling Ave. on.
Mental preparation strategy: Relaxation exercises and visualized race/strategies.
Duration of warm-up and cool-down: 3M w/up and 4M c/d.
Arousal level (1 low, 10 high) on the starting line: 6
Finish time: 29:33. Overall pace: 5:57.
Place: 104th out of 947 overall (11.0%). 102nd out of 593 men (17.2%), 10th out of 66 (15.2%) in 30-34 age group.
Splits: Didn't wear a watch; heard 5:58, 11:50 (5:52), 17:54 (6:04), 29:33 (11:39)
Things I did well in the race:
Did a fairly good job executing my thought process.
Didn't panic when I was all by myself during the 2nd mile.
Things I need to work on:
While my thought process was good, my visualization could use some work.
I wonder if things would have been better or worse had I tagged along with the guy who passed me at 1 mile. He closed the gap to the pack ahead of me while I got caught in 'no-man's land'.
Now that the sidewalks are clear I need to add in some strides.
Work on diet. No more eating all the leftover pizza in the office and no more 'handfuls' of candy.
Get back into core strengthening.
Performance rating (1-10). How close did I come to what I was capable of running that day? 7
Mentally playback the best parts of the race. Check here___x___
Other comments about the race:
McMillan calculates my 1/27 half marathon at a 29:59 8K, so I'm making progress.
Felt like something was missing, like another gear or leg speed, which makes sense because I haven't been doing strides and my hill workouts haven't been as intense as last year.

Quick recap of my recent training; Last Friday I ran a 10 mile progression run on the treadmill, dropping the pace from 8:40 down to 6:40. Saturday the girls wanted to come along, so they took turns being pushed in the stroller for a total of 7 miles. Maybe not the best idea the day before a race, but the pace/effort was really easy. Those runs gave me 50 for the week.

With warmup and cooldown, I ended up with 12 miles on Sunday. Yesterday was an easy 6 mile recovery. This morning was an example of what’s wrong with my out-and-back routes. About 4 miles into a 10 mile run my right Achilles started to ache, so I turned around and cut the run down to 8 miles. That helped, but I still had to run 4 miles with a sore Achilles. I guess that’ll teach me to go from tempo runs at 6:30 pace to racing at 6:00 pace. I’ll wear the sock tonight and see how things feel in the morning.

In contrast to yesterday’s quote of the day;

“Second place is not defeat. It is a stimulation to get better. It makes you even more determined.” – Carlos Lopes
[Hmm, if second place makes you even more determined, what does 104th place make you?]

Monday, March 19, 2007

HUMAN RACE REPORT


Well, the good news is, if I were a woman, I’d have placed 2nd overall (to Jenna’s 27:42). Last year I would have been 9th. The bad news is that’s more of a testament to who wasn’t there on the women’s side, as 7 of the 8 women that beat me last year weren’t there this year.

I’m still not sure how to feel about the race. I give myself a “B”. It was okay (29:33), but not as great as last year (29:15). I’m trying not to let it sap my gumption. Given that 6:00-pace seems to be a mental barrier for me, it was good to get under that – even if it was only by 3 seconds per mile.

Prior to the race I thought I’d try something new. I took my watch off. I figured that way I wouldn’t be tempted to worry about my splits. Then, of course, it turns out they have a clock and someone reading each split anyway. Oh well, I tried.

I’m happy to report that I followed my race plan pretty closely. I focused on how I felt and what I wanted to think about throughout the race. Unfortunately, there was still a little “something” missing, like an extra gear or a little quicker stride.

This is basically an out-and-back course, so you’d think even under the worst conditions, you’d only have a headwind for 50% of the race. However, given the direction of the wind, it felt like we had a headwind for about 70% of the race. To make matters worse, somehow I ended up in “no man’s land.” After passing the first mile (flat to gradual uphill) in 5:58, I found myself running alone. There wasn’t a single runner within 5 seconds on either side of me. So the 2nd mile (mostly a gradual downhill) ended up being a solo 5:52.

Talking to a lot of people it sounds like the 3rd mile was the slowest for most runners. I think I ran a 6:04, but that’s just doing the math in my head. I was able to pass a couple of people during this mile, but still never really had anyone to run with.

The 4th mile was a gradual uphill – about halfway through, it finally felt like we got a little tailwind. Since I’ve been getting splits all along, now I’m kind of curious what my 4th mile split is. Of course, the clock has malfunctioned and no one is there to read splits. Given that I ran 11:39 for the last 2 “miles”, I figure I ran the 4th in about 6-flat.

The last mile is a gradual downhill and I just tried to hang onto my position. Based on the crowd, I could tell there was a bunch of women right behind me. Sure enough, 5 crossed the line within 16 seconds of me.

It’s interesting that even though awards are based on gun time, results are listed by chip time. Chip results have a gal finishing in the same time as me, even though no one was around me.

I thought it’d be fun to took at the results and see how some of the people I’ve interviewed ran;

Joey Keillor 4th 24:22
Pete Gilman 10th 24:59 (his dad was 6th in the 60-64 age group, 35:53)
Mike Reneau’s dad was 2nd in the 60-64 age group, 31:55
Jason Finch 30th 25:58
Jenna Boren 1st woman 27:42
Tony Kocanda 63rd 27:48
Erin Ward 13th woman 30:31
Jim Graupner 1st in the 60-64 age group, 31:26
Tracy Hirigoyen 22nd woman 31:37
Don Wright 3rd in the 65-69 age group, 36:59

If you’d like to get inside the winner’s head, check out Patrick’s race report.

In honor of Patrick and Jenna, today’s quote of the day;

“First is first, and second is nowhere.” – Ian Stewart

Friday, March 16, 2007

FEELS LIKE FOREVER

Figuring this is a cutback week and since I haven’t had a day off in 3 weeks, I decided to put a zero in the logbook for yesterday. It’s kind of weird because even though it’s only 1 day off, technically it’ll be 2.5 days between runs – 6 AM Wednesday to 8 PM Friday. It feels like I haven’t run forever.

Since I don’t have anything else to write about, I’ll post updated journals for Jenelle Deatherage and Ryan Kleimenhagen.

Quote of the day;

“Great occasions do not make heroes or cowards; they simply unveil them to the eyes of men. Silently and imperceptibly, as we wake or sleep, we grow strong or weak; and at last some crisis shows what we have become.” – Brooke Foss Wescott

Thursday, March 15, 2007

CARRIED AWAY

Not much to report today. I got so carried away talking about gumption the other day that I forgot to post my training.

Monday night it was still 52 degrees at 8 PM, so I headed outside for my easy 5 mile recovery run. I was a little surprised by how good I felt given my efforts over the weekend. That changed on Tuesday, as I was more tired than on Monday. Oh well, no big deal. I just postponed my hill workout a day and ran an easy 6 mile recovery run.

Yesterday I headed back to the hills for a 10 mile run that included 2 sets of 4 hill repeats. This morning I slept in. I figure I can hop on the treadmill tonight (and probably tomorrow) and watch NCAA hoops.

I’ve spent a lot of time on these runs thinking about a race strategy for Sunday’s 8K. If history is any indicator, I’m usually around 29:50 to 30:10. However, last year, somehow I turned out a 29:15. I’d love to break 29 this year, but I’m going to focus more on how I feel and let the result take care of itself. Therefore, my race plan is all about what I want to think about throughout the race. Splits aren’t even on my radar.

Man, it’s hard to believe it’s been nearly 5 months since the Chicago Marathon and that I’ve only raced once in that timeframe.

Quote of the day;

“Never let yesterday take up too much of today.” – Texas E. Schramm