I guess my main problem is that my 18:10 prediction didn’t really have any merit based on my recent training. Now that I’ve looked back at last year’s training, I see months of solid mileage, tempo runs, and intervals. It’s no wonder I didn’t run nearly as fast this year.
Probably what bothers me the most is how I proceeded to run 18:44. Normally, pacing in my strong suit. Instead, I ran like a high school freshman in his first race; 5:42, 6:07, 6:15, :40.
Really, 6:15? Heck, I averaged 6:16 pace for a half marathon last year.
I have a lot of work to do. Luckily Daniels’ marathon program focuses on the last 18 weeks leading up to the race. Right now we’re 19 weeks out from TCM. So I have 1 week to lick my wounds before getting down to business.
Finally, I've always said I should try to finish a season stronger than I started it. I guess I'm in a perfect position to make that happen. If I run any slower than yesterday, I may take up gymnastics or ice skating.
And just so you don’t think every 5K in the Twin Cities in won in 20 minutes, like the results I posted last week, here are the results for men and women.
Quote of the day;
“It’s not gymnastics or ice skating, you know.” – Emil Zatopek, when questioned about his agonized expression while racing
2 comments:
That might be the most loaded road 5k field in the state this year! How about the 218'ers coming down - I see Duluth, Park Rapids and Chisholm in the top 15. Looking down the results, I found another person who did a lot of skiing this winter and was maybe disappointed to be in the 18 minute group (#86). This guy (Chad Giese) is a National elite level skiier though.
Adam, yeah it's loaded. There aren't a lot of runners there but they're all fast.
I guess it's nice to know that I'm as slow as an elite skier.
Post a Comment